Arguments against my position:

• They can become more easily distracted
• "Vicarious experience through direct observation of experienced teachers engaging in appropriate behavior poses similar logistical difficulties and verbal persuasion has limited application unless students have opportunity to perform the appropriate behaviors" ( Albion, 1999, pp. 1606).

• Computers will be taking over the educators job which can make them inefficient:
  
• "We compared online study guides to pen-and-paper study guides in terms of academic performance, the amount of time instructors spent grading guides, and student preferences. Students in 3 sections of a child psychology course used online study guides (n=46), and student in 3 other sections used pen-and-paper study guides (n=64). Instructors spent 14.3 hr during the semester grading pen-and-paper study guides and no time grading the online study guides. Students who used the online study guides reported higher satisfaction than the students who used pen-and-paper study guides. Our results suggest that integrating online study guides saved labor costs and increased student satisfaction while maintaining student performance"(Buzhardt & Semb, 2005, p. 63).
  

Sources

Albion, P. (1999). Self-efficacy beliefs as an indicator of teachers' preparedness for teaching with technology. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education (SITE 1999) (pp. 1602-1608). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/

Buzhardt, J., & Semb, G. (2005). Computers in teaching. Teaching of Psychology, 32(1), 63-66. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/