When Nine Points are Worth But Eight:
Euler's Resolution of Cramer's Paradox

Robert E. Bradley
Lee Stemkoski
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adelphi University
Garden City, NY 11530

Abstract: Gabriel Cramer and Leonhard Euler both wrote important books on the theory of equations in the mid 18th century. During the years leading up to their publication, they carried on a friendly and fruitful correspondence. One topic they discussed was a paradox that was first noticed by Maclaurin: that nine points should be sufficient to determine a curve of order three, and yet two different curves of order three could intersect in up to nine different places. Although this situation has come to be known as Cramer's Paradox, it was Euler who first suggesed the resolution of this apparent contradiction, in a letter that was lost long ago but rediscovered in the Smithsonian Institute in 2003.

In this paper, we investigate the properties of algebraic curves of order two and higher and describe Cramer's Paradox and Euler's resolution, including his elegant example of an infinite family of cubic curves that all pass through the same nine points. We also provide the first English translation of Euler's long lost letter of October 20, 1744.

Contents:

  1. Introduction
  2. Intersection of Lines and Curves
  3. Special Case: The Circle
  4. Special Case: The Parabola
  5. The Conic Sections
  6. Construction of Conics
  7. Equations of Conics
  8. Conic Exceptions
  9. Five in a Row
  10. Three or Four in a Row
  11. Higher Order Equations
  12. Determination of Higher Order Curves
  13. Cramer's Paradox
  14. Euler's Elegant Example
  15. An Infinite Family of Cubic Curves
  16. Euler's Resolution Vindicated
  17. Euler's Letter to Cramer
  18. References