Arguement #1: government interference would be too intrusive, as the FCC has no legal authority to implement and/or enforce net neutrality rules.

Argument #2: the implementation of net neutrality leads to ISPs not being properly enforced as the FCC can err in how they make proposals that can be considered counter-productive.

"...the FCC announced a proposal that may allow ISPs to build special lanes for certain traffic, provided that it does not harm consumers or decrease competition." (Bello & Jung, 2017, p. 2)

Sources:

Bello, P., Jung, J., & Global Commission on Internet Governance. (2017). The Shifting Geopolitics of Internet Access: From Broadband and Net Neutrality to Zero-rating (pp. 61-72, Rep.). Centre for International Governance Innovation. Retrieved February 23, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/resrep05240.9


Prasad, R., & Sridhar, V. (2014). The Economics of Net Neutrality. Economic and Political     

             Weekly, 49(16), 52-58. Retrieved February 23, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/24480155


Mayer-Schönberger, V. (2009). Can We Reinvent the Internet? Science, 325(5939), new series, 396-397. Retrieved February 23, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/20536682