Arguments for my position:
Legal
restrictions should
be imposed due to social media and the onset of bullying, sexting,
and harassment
within the teenage community especially against and amongst
teenage
Argument #1:
Social
media further exacerbates the problem of bullying and harassment
against sexual
assault victims by allowing for the rapid spread of videos and
photos through
the internet.
In early 2014, the University of Ottawa’s
female student council president was targeted in an online
exchange
between some of her male colleagues (Shariff et al., 2015, p.
284)
Reid Sagehorn, a high school senior, was
suspended and threatened with expulsion from Rogers High
School in Minnesota in late January for his two-word tweet
response posted on the Rogers Confessions website to the
question, “Did he ever make out” with a 28-year-old teacher at
the school. His answer, “Actually, yeah.” (Kulick, 2014, p. 1)
Girls and older teens continue to be the heaviest users of
social media sites. Among teen girls who are
social media users, 48% say they visit social networking sites
several times per day, compared with 36%
of teen boys. Looking at younger teens ages 12-13, 26% use the
sites several times per day, while nearly
twice as many teens ages 14-17 (47%) use the sites that often
(Madden et al., 2013, p. 22)
In Florida, two girls, ages 12 and 14, were arrested and
charged with a felong in the suicide death of a 12 year-old
classmate.
Her death is alleged to have resulted from their
cyber-bullying (Kulick, 2014, p. 1).
Argument #2: The
posting and rapid spreading of provocative photos of teenage
girls complicates
legal policies involving minors and consent, especially when it
involves leaked
images meant to be seen by certain individuals, (sexting).
Most teen social media users, often minors, say they aren’t very
concerned about
third-party access to their data (Madden et al., 2013, p.
56).
The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA) even as it
is thought of
today as a law built to safeguard children’s physical
well-being, began as an attempt to protect children p e wi n t
er n e t.o r g 57
under 13 from having their personal information collected for
business purposes without their parent’s
permission (Madden et al., 2013, p. 56).
Few teens report a high level of concern that some of the
information they share on social networking sites might be
accessed by third parties like advertisers or
businesses without their knowledge; 31% say that
they are “somewhat” concerned, while just 9% say that they are
“very” concerned. 39 Another 60% in
total report that they are “not too” concerned (38%) or “not at
all” concerned (22%). Younger teen
social media users ages 12-13 are considerably more likely than
older teens (14-17) to say that they are
“very concerned” about third party access to the information
they share (17% vs. 6%). Girls and boys
report the same levels of concern (Madden et al., 2013, p. 57).
Under, Pennsylvania's sexting
law, it is a crime for a minor (anyone between the ages
of 12 to 18) to send an electronic message with a nude picture
of themselves or anyone else between the ages of 12 and 18 (Kulick, 2014, p. 1).
Shariff,
S., & DeMartini, A. (2015). Defining the legal lines: eGirls
and intimate images.
In Bailey J. & Steeves V. (Eds.), EGirls, eCitizens: Putting
Technology,
Theory and Policy into Dialogue with Girls’ and Young Women’s
Voices (pp.
281-306). University of Ottawa Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt15nmj7f.15