Arguments against my position: Legal restrictions should be imposed due to social media and the onset of bullying, sexting, and harassment within the teenage community especially against and amongst teenage

Argument #1: Social media has allowed for the opening of conversation and forums leading to diversity of thoughts, opinions, and empowerment. Putting legal actions and restrictions against online postings due to bullying and the spreading of provocative content would stifle this ability and can be a gateway to into more internet restrictions.








Argument #2 : Individuals who post on social media should be aware that such postings can be spread rapidly and be saved online and should be held accountable for posting provocative content when seeking legal action for whatever reason.







Sources

Austin-McCain, M. (2017). An examination of the Association of Social Media Use with the satisfaction with daily routines and healthy lifestyle habits for undergraduate and graduate students. Open Journal Of Occupational Therapy (OJOT), 5(4), 1-13. doi:10.15453/2168-6408.1327

Elefant, C. (2011). The "power" of social media: legal issues & best practices for utilities engaging social media. Energy Law Journal, 32(1), 1-56.


Madden, M., Lenhart, A., Cortesi, S., Gasser, U., Duggan, M., Smith, A., & Beaton, M. (2013, May 1). Teens, social media, and privacy. Retrieved February 23, 2018, from http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2013/05/PIP_TeensSocialMediaandPrivacy_PDF.pdf


Shariff, S., & DeMartini, A. (2015). Defining the legal lines: eGirls and intimate images. In Bailey J. & Steeves V. (Eds.), EGirls, eCitizens: Putting Technology, Theory and Policy into Dialogue with Girls’ and Young Women’s Voices (pp. 281-306). University of Ottawa Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt15nmj7f.15