Arguments For My Position



Argument #1: Activists, advocates, and scholars use social media and the Internet to raise awareness for their struggles and present their viewpoints in an unbiased light.


Argument #2: Many social media sites have “flag”-like features that allow users to report any hateful, inappropriate, and/or disturbing content.



Sources

 

Balkin, Jack M. “Free Speech Is A Triangle.” EbscoHost, Columbia Law Review, Nov. 2018, web.a.ebscohost.com.libproxy.adelphi.edu/ehost/detail/detail?vid=0&sid=2ad46c0f-4aa2-4411-8b4e-2ee4eea0d63c%40sessionmgr4007&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#AN=133029108&db=bth.

 

Chander, Anupam, and Uyên P Lê. “Free Speech.” Iowa Law Review, vol. 100, no. 2, Jan. 2015, https://search-proquest-com.libproxy.adelphi.edu/central/docview/1686794628/8B25197DA8764BB3PQ/1?accountid=8204


Nekrasov, Michael, et al. “A User-Driven Free Speech Application For Anonymous and Verified Online, Public Group Discourse.” ProQuest, Journal of Internet Services and Applications, Nov. 2018, search-proquest-com.libproxy.adelphi.edu/central/docview/231477093/3FFAD1C8124445FDPQ/2?accountid=8204.

 

Timmer, Joel. “Promoting and Infringing Free Speech? Net Neutrality and the First Amendment.” ProQuest, Federal Communications Law Journal, Dec. 2018.


Yu, Wenguang. “Internet Intermediaries' Liability For Online Illegal Hate Speech.” ProQuest, Frontiers of Law in China, Sept. 2018, search-proquest-com.libproxy.adelphi.edu/abiglobal/docview/2120787908/B2D66EB775A543FAPQ/45?accountid=8204.