Arguments against my position


Social networking does not provide a new platform for bullying.

        -Cyber bullying is basic every day bullying behind a computer screen. In an English study approximately 100,000 teens faced “more incidences of face-to-face bullying than internet abuse.” (Wilson)

        -The argument about social media leading to a huge problem in this generation is a result of millennial parents not growing up with the same technology and therefore being scared of the power of social media. (Wilson)


  Cyber bullying is not a problem for every user that goes onto a social networking site.

        -In a study in Germany, it was found that those who were considered to be cyberbullies displayed “a significant correlation with poor mental health.” (Baier)

        -This study was conducted among 10,638 adolescents (both male and female) and found that cyber bullying itself was not a common threat because not all have the same poor mental health qualities that attribute to this behavior. (Baier)


These sites have created an environment that allows for the sharing of creativity, and with monitoring on comments that would limit creativity.

            -Legislation in Canada is being enforced to make sure that what is uploaded to the internet is not harmful, but still allows creative expression that is “pure.” (MacKay)

Sources

Baier, Dirk, et al. “Consequences of Bullying on Adolescents’ Mental Health in Germany:           Comparing Face-to-Face Bullying and Cyberbullying.” Journal of Child and Family    Studies, vol. 28, no. 9, 2018, pp. 2347–2357., doi:10.1007/s10826-018-1181-6.

        MacKay, Peter. “Government Introduces Legislation to Crack Down on                                        Cyberbulling.” Marketwired, 20 Nov. 2013, ProQuest Central, doi:1459753401.

        Wilson, Clare et al. “Is life today bad for teens? Headlines Claim Our Teenagers are in                 the Midst             of a Mental Health Crisis. The Reality is Far More Complex                     says Clare Wilson” New Scientist, 02624079, 11/04/2017, Vol. 236, Issue 3150