Arguments against my position
"While social media vendors have moral
responsibilities to allow open debate, we also ought not
deteriorate into government stamps of approval on what counts as
hate speech, misinformation, or "fake," and so on. And we must
guard against policies with unintended consequences like denying
the inherent right of the individual to post on social media
anonymously -- if vendor chooses to allow that." (Crews Jr. 2)
"Social media and the internet platforms have been a great source
of free expression, debate, and political participation, as well
as being the leading edge of an innovative American economy. But
private sector actors can flourish only within the context of a
broader democratic polity, and as such they have a responsibility
to help maintain the health of that political system. This was
something well understood by traditional media companies"
(Fukuyama 3)